Typically, our group meetings allow for a brief overlap from the preceding panel discussion with immediate reflection of the highs and lows of what was communicated by the guest speakers... this week was a little different. We rolled into a conversation about the mentor-protégé relationship that eventually morphed into a larger engaging discussion regarding the role academia plays in the preparation of students for the world of the practicing Architect. 
Each of us had a different experience in school. Everyone missed something... or something missed them. The consensus seems to be a need for a stronger connection between the practicing firm and the theoretical vacuum-sealed academic world. There is an obvious, and naturally understood, lack of engagement with the foundational aspects of the institute's preparation of today's Architecture student. One popularly identified shortcoming of Architecture school is: solely basing one's education in the conceptual design world leaves significant holes with respect to conscious team building relationships and defining the leadership roles of the various aspects of a project team. Do you feel like your University properly armed you with the skills to step off the stage and into the world of practicing Architecture? If not, what concepts, skills, and aspects could your education have incorporated to better equip you?
Not specifically focused on the negative detachment between the role of the teacher and the student, the conversation eventually targeted the potential bridging ability each of us possesses.
Your voice is the connection, and do not underestimate your power and potential to be the catalyst for change.
Are you willing to think outside the box? Or better yet, contrary to popular belief, consciously step outside of it in a moment of questioned integrity? Or do you subscribe to the theory of: "the nail that sticks out it the first to get hammered down." Perhaps it's not such a revolutionary concept to think that not only do you have a chance to go back to your University to let your voice be heard, but it is your responsibility. There should be an expectation of your involvement.
Can you, as a former student of your respective institution, challenge the groups to come up with a solution that benefits both the academic world and the practicing firm? That's our role as an Architect anyway, right? To engage in a conversation to problem solve outside of the realm of self interest while remaining on course with the long term vision? There is an opportunity to act as an agent of change, and to identify places you can contribute without exercising authority.
"Practice is an advancement of the academy." - Dr. Pete DeLisle
Rocky Owens
OMNIPLAN Architects
No comments:
Post a Comment